On pe, 2010-06-11 at 17:23 +0200, Martin Ott wrote: > > Maybe lazy_expunge_public setting that's equivalent to lazy_expunge > > setting, except is used for public namespaces. But ACLs could make it > > problematic.. > > Maybe ACLs could be copied to the expunged folder.
ACLs could change, so I don't think copying is ok. Adding some logic to always use the original one's ACLs would be better, but I don't know how difficult that would be to implement. > There could also be an > option whether the expunged folder inherits the original ACsL or if a global > ACL should be applied, such that e.g. only the mailadmin gets write access to > the expunged folder. Some global default ACL might be easier, but that's not very flexible. Anyway, this is pretty low priority on my todo list.
