Am 11.06.2010 17:31, schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On pe, 2010-06-11 at 17:23 +0200, Martin Ott wrote: >>> Maybe lazy_expunge_public setting that's equivalent to lazy_expunge >>> setting, except is used for public namespaces. But ACLs could make it >>> problematic.. >> >> Maybe ACLs could be copied to the expunged folder. > > ACLs could change, so I don't think copying is ok. Adding some logic to > always use the original one's ACLs would be better, but I don't know how > difficult that would be to implement. > >> There could also be an >> option whether the expunged folder inherits the original ACsL or if a global >> ACL should be applied, such that e.g. only the mailadmin gets write access to >> the expunged folder. > > Some global default ACL might be easier, but that's not very flexible. > > Anyway, this is pretty low priority on my todo list. >
thanks for your points - now I see the arising dificulties Anyway, for the private namespace lazy_expunge plugins stays a very convenient method to restore mailboxes and mails from users who accidently expunged them. thank you! Martin