On 7/6/12 9:56 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.7.2012, at 23.28, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
Thanks, that certainly helps identify the configuration options. However I am more
concerned about the experiences of others who have actually used the replication.
What is the rate of change on your mail cluster, how many concurrent users do you
support with replication enabled, do you use synchronous or asynchronous replication,
are you using it in an active/active or active/passive state, is it possible to have
a cluster with multiple servers at each site hosting the same mail data, does dysnc
replication scale well (10,000 -> 100,000 -> 1,000,000 users)? Just trying to
get a good feel for whether dsync replication is capable of handling the use case I
am proposing before investing too much time in testing it.
I wouldn't use it for large systems yet. It is still pretty inefficient. v2.2
will have a redesigned dsync that can do incremental syncs much faster and with
less bandwidth.
Anyway, in my small installation I'm using it in active-active mode and it
works well enough. I've even configured my clients intentionally so that they
use different servers.
Timo,
Does dsync replication only work between two hosts? In my scenario I
would have two sites with X number of nodes at each with an NFS backend
for each site. For this example lets say I have site A with two nodes
that mount one NFS share, and site B with two nodes that mount one NFS
share. Is it possible to implement dsync replication between these two
clusters of nodes?
