On 2012-08-24, at 7.01, Jerry <je...@seibercom.net> wrote: > I would personally recommend supporting it. If history teaches us > anything, it is that sooner or later, and usually sooner, someone will > require that block. Being prepared for it in advance would seem like > the prudent thing to do.
I wonder whether it would be better to make the exclusion list configurable. As I understand it, the intention is to avoid treating connections through a load balancer or proxy as though they're the same client device. The assumption that private address = proxy is a fair default, but some sites will be using public addresses for their proxies. And that's only going to increase with IPv6. -- Matthew Powell matt...@atom.net
