On 23/08/2012 21:49, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I specifically use 172.16.0.0/12 because others don't, I also specifically don't use 172.16.0.0/16, because if someone does use 172.16.0.0/12 they usually only use 172.16.0.0/16... It's easy for people to connect to my networks via a VPN connection, and generally not have any IP conflicts with their own RFC1918 ranges and not have to fiddle with NAT issues.On 23.8.2012, at 23.26, Warren Baker wrote:On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote:On 14.8.2012, at 11.18, Timo Sirainen wrote: v2.2 has this now: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/8d7f9e2d726cIs there a reason why 172.16.0.0/12 was left out of the change ^^ ?Is it actually used? :) I've used 192.168 in my home network and all corporate networks I've seen have been 10/8. But yeah, I guess since there aren't more than those 3 I'll just add it (I thought there were more of them, but looks like they're reserved for other purposes).
-- Regards, Giles Coochey, CCNA, CCNAS NetSecSpec Ltd +44 (0) 7983 877438 http://www.coochey.net http://www.netsecspec.co.uk gi...@coochey.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
