On 11/10/2013 08:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 10.11.2013, at 20.00, Daniele Nicolodi <dani...@grinta.net> wrote:
Additionally I feel that Dovecot documentation can see some love as
well. Having the wiki as main source of documentation does not look
very polished, compared, for example to the extremely good written and
maintained Postfix documentation.
I don’t know how to improve the current documentation. (Other than
implementing the few missing man pages.) There is going to be a Dovecot
book soon though, maybe that’ll help.
How Dovecot documentation can be improved? Well, what I find extremely
helpful from the Postfix documentation but cannot find the equivalent
for Dovecot is: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
Wiki's are helpful, but a full list of all configuration parameters, how
they work and, when applicable, how they are related to other
parameters will likely help a lot of users.
--
Rob