On 2022-10-21 06:19, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
On Oct 21, 2022, at 4:19 AM, Antonio Leding <t...@leding.net> wrote:

My understanding is that Director is targeted toward large enterprise mail installations that will incorporate several servers for a given function. In such an environment, Director would be the fore-person\traffic-cop keeping things organized & squared-away.

Director is used when you setup frontend servers in a load-balance cluster, proxy imap/pop3/lmtp/managesieve requests to backend Dovecot servers.

I setup load-balance cluster for clients with HAProxy + KeepAlived + Dovecot Director running in frontend servers, so sad we have to find an alternative to replace Director in such case.

It's not about "small/medium" servers, but the demand of imap/pop3/lmtp proxy service, especially in load-balance cluster.

----
Zhang Huangbin, founder of:
- iRedMail: Open source email server solution: https://www.iredmail.org/ - Spider: Lightweight, on-premises Email Archiving Software: https://spiderd.io

Hi,

I was wondering if one can achieve the same implementation with haproxy without dovecot director? Load balancing all requests to pop3, imap, managesieve and lmtp services from specified frontend servers i.e. webmail to specified backend servers and using NFS mount filesystem/syncing data across all servers to access emails with high availability?

Not sure whats the big deal director is offering? Is it just a native functionality providing a feature to find which backend server have X emails available and chooses to load from e.g. its content i.e. like checks which first server that doesnt return http 404 response equivalent in IMAP/POP3/LMTP/ManageSieve?

Sometime ago I used Varnish caching directors to implement high availability using 404 response status in http web server, and it seems great if we can have this feature in dovecot too, as it offers high availability with delayed-syncing/partial-syncing across unknown selected servers, I managed to use Varnish too in dovecot proxy service i.e. the webmail, yet it requires NFS mount or high available file system all servers can have through immediate access to e.g. maildir?

Any helpful input that would clear the picture for me in regards dovecot director, would be ver much appreciated.

With thanks.

Zakaria.

Reply via email to