Hey Shawn,

I agree with both of you :)

I appreciate the auto-searches (esp. the calculator, currency conversion and
URL detection), but I guess my fear is that the behavior is going to be
ambiguous and/or surprising.

> If I type a phone number I want the 
> reverse lookup result. 

This is a prime example. I live in Sweden - I don't care about the
Switchboard search in the slightest, so I've built my own, localized version
which queries www.gulasidorna.se instead. Having DQSD detect phone numbers
per default is just a waste for me, since it uses the wrong search. 

> If I type in an IP address I'd like to 
> return information about that address (and the DNS IP tools 
> do seem to be a better fit for it).

I would expect it to launch as an URL. Different people expect different
things.

To me, this is just a variation on the aliases problem, where "." means CNN
(I've had a lot of people ask me about why they end up at cnn.com when they
search for .NET samples), and # means Switchboard (again).

I don't know, I guess we could improve and rework the design of
auto-handlers, and ship with a minimal set (preferably the ones I'm using
;]). But ideally, I'd like to avoid even more long-distance coupling between
.js files via global vars. I'm looking at this more from a maintainer- than
a user perspective. 

> I looked around the DQSD and SF sites and don't see a 
> roadmap. Are there any milestones for releases beyond the 
> next one "to include support for XP-SP2?

You know, I was hoping we could work something out on the list, and save it
in written form. I have some crazy ideas I want to try out for the next
version, and I think we should make it a major release (as Brent suggested
earlier), so we can take the liberty to work through just the kinds of
issues you're talking about. I think for a major version change, we can also
afford to break old behavior we no longer care for.

I'm not sure how much time I'll have in the coming few days, but I thought
I'd start writing up a simple design doc that we can work from. Your
concerns are certainly well-founded, I want to start with defining the
goals.

We should get a Wiki.

- Kim



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel

Reply via email to