Hi Shawn, > > > (the http authentication scheme is a good example). > > > > Actually, this is a debated issue... > > I know, which is why I tried to steer clear. [...]
Yeah, your point is valid, that MS may decide to break any existing feature in the name of security. I still hold that as highly unlikely in the case of the XML parser, but let's agree to disagree -- I don't think we'll come to a conclusion. > As a hard-core text-based geek I'm still > gunning for the ability to be able to use a command-line > approach to making configuration changes. I'd really like to > see "config var=value" in the next version. Sure, I think that's a great idea, and exchanging the storage doesn't pose any problems with that, does it? I noticed your entry on this in the Wiki as well, and I can't help but wonder -- how would you implement that with our current stuff? - Kim ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel
