And he IS a developer. ;) It would be a perfect Sidebar gadget, IMO. There are other attempts at multiple search gadgets, but they're lame. One touts itself as hot stuff because it has 8 different searches! And none of them can do what DQSD does or anything close.
Charlie. http://msmvps.com/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Peek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'DQSD development discussions'" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:25 PM Subject: Re: [DQSD-Devel] lipsum partially broken Agreed. Sidebar gadgets are just html pages running in an instance of IE. It really should be easy to port the existing search.htm to work in the sidebar. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Russel > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:46 PM > To: DQSD development discussions > Subject: Re: [DQSD-Devel] lipsum partially broken > > That same JavaScript should be callable from a Vista Gadget, _if_ I > understand how they work. But keep in mind, IANAD. > > Charlie. > http://msmvps.com/xperts64 > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-devel- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Gräsman > > Sent: September-20-07 1:13 PM > > To: DQSD development discussions > > Subject: Re: [DQSD-Devel] lipsum partially broken > > > > Charlie, Glenn, > > > > The problem/strength of DQSD is that it consumes active content -- > > every search contains JavaScript. > > > > I think getting a new DQSD to consume the existing searches would > be > > pretty hard. But I'm not sure, maybe it's not so bad. > > > > I'll think about it... > > > > - Kim > > > > On 9/20/07, Charlie Russel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I agree, this would be a perfect Vista Gadget. And should be able > to > > > consume the same or very similar search files. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd- > devel- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Carr > > > > Sent: September-20-07 12:07 PM > > > > To: 'DQSD development discussions' > > > > Subject: Re: [DQSD-Devel] lipsum partially broken > > > > > > > > Kim wrote: > > > > > Oh well, I'm beginning to wonder whether DQSD can actually > survive > > > > > much longer what with all the platform "improvements". > > > > > > > > Yup. I'm not running Vista anywhere, but I think DQSD's > lifetime, in > > > its > > > > current state, is limited. I _do_ think that a Vista gadget > with the > > > same > > > > type of extensibility would be very nice. > > > > > > > > I'm convinced someone with enough time, energy, motivation, and > > > know-how > > > > could probably come up with a nice Vista gadget similar to > DQSD, > > > possibly > > > > even consuming the same search files, or at least of port of > those > > > search > > > > files. > > > > > > > > Time, energy, motivation, and know-how. That's all that's > required. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel
