"Bob Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Oh no he's back!", I hear you say.

I finally got some time this morning to put the R4C back on the bench.  I
have modified my test setup to use direct injection of signals via
attenuators.  My signal generators are a TS570 and a TS870.  Both are
producing 10W output into dummy loads from which signals are bled off
through 100k resistors to a common 50 ohm resistor.  The output across this
second 50 ohm resistor is fed to a 2 way coax switch allowing me to inject
the resulting two tone signal into either the R4C or a TS930.  The TS570 was
running on 14100 kHz and the TS870 on 14170 kHz.

I injected the two-tone signal into the TS930 and it produced signals on
14100 & 14170 of around S9+50dB on the 930 s-meter.  I checked for a third
order product on 2*14100 - 14170 = 14030 and it was audible but making no
discernible s-meter deflection.  Somewhere around 90dB down.  Next, I
injected the same two-tone signal into the R-4C.  Signals at 14100 & 14170
indicated S9+45 on the R-4C and at 14030 indicated S9.  Apparently, only
around 45dB down.

I then connected the 930 via *10 scope probe to the output of the 5645
roofing filter and tuned the 930 to that frequency.  I tuned the R-4C to
14100 & 14170 and found 1st mixer output on 5645 at around S9+40.  I then
tuned the R-4C to 14030 and the 930 s-meter indicated S8 or around 45dB
down.

At this point I believe I have reconfirmed the following:

1. The TS930 has adequate IMD3 performance to serve as a spectrum analyser
in this test.
2. My makeshift combiner/attenuator for the signals from the 570 & 870
introduces no discernable IMD of its own.
3. The R-4C IMD problem is caused somewhere in the 6BA6 RF stage and 6EJ7
mixer stage.

Next, I connected the output of the R-4C rf stage into the TS930 via my *10
scope probe.  I checked for signals on 14100 & 14170.  These were
end-stopping the 930 s-meter so I added some attenuation to bring them down
to S9+50.  I checked 14030 and found the IMD was at S7 or around 65dB down.
This is not good but not as bad as only 45dB down.

I increased the screen voltage on the RF amplifier 6BA6 and found I could
increase the gap between the two-tone signal strengths and the IMD to better
than 80db.  At this point I thought I was onto a winner.  I reconnected my
*10 scope probe to the 5695 roofing filter output and checked for the
relative strength of the IMD to two-tone signals at that frequency.
Disappointingly the gap had narrowed to <40 dB.

My suspicions at this point are:

1. The IMD performance of the 6BA6 RF amp can be improved by an increase in
screen voltage.
2. Increasing the screen voltage of the 6BA6 also increases its gain which
further overloads the 6EJ7 mixer causing its IMD performance to deteriorate
more than the RF amps performance improves.
3. The 6EJ7 mixer is primarily responsible for the IMD problem, probably due
to inappropriate levels of input signal.

Next, I measured the pre-mix injection level at the junction of C31 and T4.
This was a good clean sinewave of 2.1V p.p.  I then switched off the pre-mix
chain by selecting an accesory xtal which wasn't present and measured the
amplitude of my two-tone signal output from the 6BA6 RF amp.  Measured at
the junction of C29, C197 and C30 this was found to be 1.2V p.p.

I am very surprised by this roughly 2:1 ratio and not surprised at the
resulting IMD output.  I feel sure the ratio of pre-mix to received signals
should be much greater.

Next, I monitored the two-tone signals emerging from the 6BA6 RF amp and
reduced their level with the RF gain control until it fell to 0.35V or 350mV
p.p.  At this level the ratio of pre-mix to received signals has increased
from 2:1 to 6:1.

I reconnected my *10 scope probe on the 930 input to the output of the 5645
roofing filter.  Signals at 14100 & 14170 were S9+40.  THe IMD signal on
14030 was audible but not moving the S-meter.  That's 80dB down!

So where do I think I've got to?

1.  I can improve IMD performance of the RF stage by increasing screen
voltage on the 6BA6 RF amp.  That's for later though, as the big problem is
apparently with the 6EJ7 first mixer.

2. There is a problem with the relative amplitude of the inputs to the 6EJ7,
possibly also with their absolute levels.

I have two questions:

1. Is a pre-mix injection level of 2.1V p.p. measured at the junction of T4
and C31 what I should expect?
2. Is an output of 1.2V p.p. from the 6BA6 the expected level from signals
which read S9+45 on the S-meter?

Many thanks for your indulgence, if you've taken the time to read the above.
Any help will be appreciated.

73

Bob, 5B4AGN





----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Behalf of "Bob Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Submissions:        drakelist@www.zerobeat.net
Unsubscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to