Garey -
  Many thanks.

Linking across the (disconnected) filter brings the bandwidth to what one would 
expect with just the IFTs at first IF. The selectivity is then properly 
controlled at the bandpass LC filter as it should be. 

I removed T6, the xtal filter can. There are only two xtals in a simple half 
lattice configuration (marked 5645 and 5642kHz), no internal capacitors, and 
the matching transformer at the output is not quite as in the circuit in the 
manual I have. There it is shown as an autotransformer, in reality it has two 
windings, the common output of the two xtals being to the hot end of the low 
impedance primary winding at the earthy end of the secondary. Hence, 
electrically, virtually no different to the circuit.

Out of the receiver, the filter tests OK with a sig gen, the two xtals working, 
no sign of a problem, with series resonance at 5644.7 and 5641.0kHz.

So the next test when I have a workshop session will be on T5 secondary, 
perhaps the secondary connected to the 5642kHz xtal has a problem.

By the way, the receiver is about 40dB low on sensitivity as well (I bought it 
that way earlier this year - in need of a challenge!).
So far, I have the RF amplifier documented, but ideally would be good to 
compare to a fully working set.
T1 has a measured Q of 60 at 3.6MHz, and a step up of about 2.5.
gm of the 6BZ6 at the bias point is about 2mA/V, and with the calculated 
dynamic impedance of T2 at 3.6MHz of 4500 ohms, the stage gain is theoretically 
9, though I measure 7, so not far off. I intend to go through like this, stage 
by stage, as I've yet to find whether this level of detail is already available.

73
Gwyn
G3ZIL

________________________________________
From: drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net [drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net] On Behalf 
Of Garey Barrell [k4...@mindspring.com]
Sent: 18 July 2010 14:46
To: drakelist
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] R4B xtal filter bandwidth problem

Gwyn -

Certainly sounds like a bad filter.  Can't say I've ever seen or heard
of one failing that way.  Seems highly unlikely.

I'd start by just connecting a wire between the leads going to the input
and output of the filter, after disconnecting them from the filter itself.

The filter is most likely just a series of four (it's a four pole
filter) crystals connected in series with small caps to ground between
them.  It's a little hard to imagine THREE crystals all failing or
coming 'unglued' at the same time.  I assume this was a catastrophic
failure.   Does the receiver still seem about the same sensitivity, just
restricted?

Let us know what you find!

73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line&  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
<www.k4oah.com>


Griffiths G. wrote:
> Folks
> Does anyone have experience of the R4B as-fitted xtal fliter showing a -3dB 
> bandwidth of just 250Hz, from 5644.910 to 5644.660kHz
>
> This suggests to me that only one crystal is in circuit, but I do not have 
> the circuit of what is in the can so I can be sure.
> Is there a circuit available?
> Before I dismantle,  suggestions welcome as to any other diagnostics I can do.
>
> many thanks
>
> 73s, Gwyn Griffiths
> G3ZIL
>
>

_______________________________________________
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


_______________________________________________
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist

Reply via email to