Lee -
Most that I have seen have been 'out of alignment', although usually not
too bad. Unless of course someone has been 'working on them', or
'tightened up all the loose screws'.!
The alignment is a simple procedure and most will benefit from a touch-up.
73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA
Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line
and TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
<www.k4oah.com>
kc9...@aol.com wrote:
May be some of them out there are not working correctly??
Or just need alignment. These things are 30+ ysr old...:-)
73,
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Youngman <n...@tx.rr.com>
To: drakelist <drakelist@zerobeat.net>
Sent: Wed, Feb 2, 2011 6:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Wanted 4NB Noise Blanker
Interesting in the different perspectives. I always found my R-4C to
have a
noise blanker that was a "standard of comparison" for anything else.
At least
on the noise here, it worked very well with a GUF-1 installed.
Dynamic range is another issue, but the NB was outstanding.
Grant/NQ5T
On Feb 1, 2011, at 6:18 PM, John Hudson wrote:
FWIW, the mod's to my "Sherwood R-4C" do allow you to use the
standard 6kHz
front end filter. The 4NB noise blanker has only been marginally
successful,
at best, even when I revert to the standard filters.
_______________________________________________
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
_______________________________________________
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
_______________________________________________
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
