On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:44:27PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:30:52AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:23:17PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> Android can expose fences to userspace. It's possible to make the new > > > >> fence > > > >> mechanism expose the same fences to userspace by changing > > > >> sync_fence_create > > > >> to take a struct fence instead of a struct sync_pt. No other change is > > > >> needed, > > > >> because only the fence parts of struct sync_pt are used. But because > > > >> the > > > >> userspace fences are a separate problem and I haven't really looked at > > > >> it yet > > > >> I feel it should stay in staging, for now. > > > > > > > > Ok, that's reasonable. > > > > > > > > At first glance, this all looks "sane" to me, any objection from anyone > > > > if I merge this through my driver-core tree for 3.17? > > > > > > Ack from my side fwiw. > > > > Thanks, I'll queue it up later today. > > btw should we add you as a (co)maintainer for driver/core/dma-buf since > you seem to want to keep a closer tab on what the insane gfx folks are up > to in there?
Sure, why not, what's one more maintainership... Oh, does that mean you want me to be the one collecting the patches and forwarding them on to Linus? If so, that's fine, I can easily do that as well due to my infrastructure being set up for it. thanks, greg k-h
