On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 02:04:21PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Do we have any need to differentiate between this and what VBT has? We
> could just treat dev_priv->vbt as "VBT or what BIOS did", and do
> dev_priv->vbt.lvds_use_ssc = true; here, possibly with a
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS. It would simplify code elsewhere and be less error prone.
> We already do a similar thing for the eDP bpp (see intel_dp.c, look for
> "This is a big fat ugly hack").

Indeed, that is a nice simplification. Conceptually, at least.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Reply via email to