On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:49:26PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2014, Christoph Jaeger <christophjaeger at linux.com> wrote:
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS includes printing the function name.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Jaeger <christophjaeger at linux.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c
> > index 954acb2..ce5242f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c
> > @@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static enum drm_mode_status ns2501_mode_valid(struct
> > intel_dvo_device *dvo,
> > struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> > {
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS
> > - ("%s: is mode valid
> > (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d)\n",
> > - __FUNCTION__, mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay,
> > - mode->vtotal);
> > + ("is mode valid (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d)\n",
> > + mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay, mode->vtotal);
> >
> > /*
> > * Currently, these are all the modes I have data from.
> > @@ -261,9 +260,8 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device
> > *dvo,
> > struct ns2501_priv *ns = (struct ns2501_priv *)(dvo->dev_priv);
> >
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS
> > - ("%s: set mode (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d).\n",
> > - __FUNCTION__, mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay,
> > - mode->vtotal);
> > + ("set mode (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d).\n",
> > + mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay, mode->vtotal);
> >
> > /*
> > * Where do I find the native resolution for which scaling is not
> > required???
> > @@ -277,8 +275,7 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device
> > *dvo,
> > if (mode->hdisplay == 800 && mode->vdisplay == 600) {
> > /* mode 277 */
> > ns->reg_8_shadow &= ~NS2501_8_BPAS;
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: switching to 800x600\n",
> > - __FUNCTION__);
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("switching to 800x600\n");
> >
> > /*
> > * No, I do not know where this data comes from.
> > @@ -341,8 +338,7 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device
> > *dvo,
> >
> > } else if (mode->hdisplay == 640 && mode->vdisplay == 480) {
> > /* mode 274 */
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: switching to 640x480\n",
> > - __FUNCTION__);
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("switching to 640x480\n");
> > /*
> > * No, I do not know where this data comes from.
> > * It is just what the video bios left in the DVO, so
> > @@ -406,8 +402,7 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device
> > *dvo,
> >
> > } else if (mode->hdisplay == 1024 && mode->vdisplay == 768) {
> > /* mode 280 */
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: switching to 1024x768\n",
> > - __FUNCTION__);
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("switching to 1024x768\n");
> > /*
> > * This might or might not work, actually. I'm silently
> > * assuming here that the native panel resolution is
> > @@ -458,8 +453,7 @@ static void ns2501_dpms(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
> > bool enable)
> > struct ns2501_priv *ns = (struct ns2501_priv *)(dvo->dev_priv);
> > unsigned char ch;
> >
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: Trying set the dpms of the DVO to %i\n",
> > - __FUNCTION__, enable);
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Trying set the dpms of the DVO to %i\n", enable);
> >
> > ch = ns->reg_8_shadow;
> >
> > --
> > 1.8.5.3
> >
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
