On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 04:40:47PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 06:08:51PM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com > wrote: > > From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > > > Currently drm_cflush_virt_rage() takes a char* so the caller probably > > has to do pointless casting to avoid compiler warnings. Make the > > argument void* instead to avoid such issues. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > Can we not use a gcc'ism to allow pointer arithmetic on void *?
Personally I'd be fine with that. So if no one disagrees I can send a v2. -- Ville Syrj?l? Intel OTC
