In the latest version of CUnit the fourth parameter of the CU_SuiteInfo
struct is pSetUpFunc rather than *pTests.

Seems like the CUnit ABI broke at some point, so let's the the robust
thing and use c99 designated initializers to correctly populate the
struct(s).

Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
Cc: Leo Liu <leo.liu at amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
---
 tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.c b/tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.c
index 6568990..71f357c 100644
--- a/tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.c
+++ b/tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.c
@@ -58,14 +58,30 @@ int drm_amdgpu[MAX_CARDS_SUPPORTED];

 /** The table of all known test suites to run */
 static CU_SuiteInfo suites[] = {
-       { "Basic Tests", suite_basic_tests_init,
-         suite_basic_tests_clean, basic_tests },
-       { "BO Tests", suite_bo_tests_init,
-         suite_bo_tests_clean, bo_tests },
-       { "CS Tests", suite_cs_tests_init,
-         suite_cs_tests_clean, cs_tests },
-       { "VCE Tests", suite_vce_tests_init,
-         suite_vce_tests_clean, vce_tests },
+       {
+               .pName = "Basic Tests",
+               .pInitFunc = suite_basic_tests_init,
+               .pCleanupFunc = suite_basic_tests_clean,
+               .pTests = basic_tests,
+       },
+       {
+               .pName = "BO Tests",
+               .pInitFunc = suite_bo_tests_init,
+               .pCleanupFunc = suite_bo_tests_clean,
+               .pTests = bo_tests,
+       },
+       {
+               .pName = "CS Tests",
+               .pInitFunc = suite_cs_tests_init,
+               .pCleanupFunc = suite_cs_tests_clean,
+               .pTests = cs_tests,
+       },
+       {
+               .pName = "VCE Tests",
+               .pInitFunc = suite_vce_tests_init,
+               .pCleanupFunc = suite_vce_tests_clean,
+               .pTests = vce_tests,
+       },
        CU_SUITE_INFO_NULL,
 };

-- 
2.5.0

Reply via email to