On Sun, 3 Jul 2011, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> > Dear Jesper,
> >
> >
> > Am Sonntag, den 03.07.2011, 12:25 +0200 schrieb Jesper Juhl:
> > > If we return due to an unknown chipset in
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv20_graph.c:nv20_graph_create() we'll leak the
> > > memory allocated to 'pgraph'.
> > >
> > > This patch should fix the leak and it also disambiguates the "PGRAPH:
> > > unknown chipset\n" error message - it's nice to be able to tell which
> > > branch created the error which is impossible if the error messages are
> > > 100% identical.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <j...@chaosbits.net>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv20_graph.c | 4 +++-
> > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Don't have the hardware, so compile tested only.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv20_graph.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv20_graph.c
> > > index affc7d7..059ad65 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv20_graph.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv20_graph.c
> > > @@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ nv20_graph_create(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > pgraph->grctx_user = 0x0000;
> > > break;
> > > default:
> > > + kfree(pgraph);
> > > NV_ERROR(dev, "PGRAPH: unknown chipset\n");
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -773,7 +774,8 @@ nv20_graph_create(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > pgraph->grctx_size = NV35_36_GRCTX_SIZE;
> > > break;
> > > default:
> > > - NV_ERROR(dev, "PGRAPH: unknown chipset\n");
> > > + kfree(pgraph);
> > > + NV_ERROR(dev, "PGRAPH: unknown chipset.\n");
> >
> > so the only disambiguation is the full stop at the end?
> >
> Yeah. I guess I could have reworded the text, but I settled on just adding
> that "."...
>
I guess this is better :
From: Jesper Juhl <j...@chaosbits.net>
Subject: [PATCH] nouveau: Do not leak in nv20_graph_create
If we return due to an unknown chipset in
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv20_graph.c:nv20_graph_create() we'll leak the memory
allocated to 'pgraph'.
This patch should fix the leak and it also disambiguates the "PGRAPH:
unknown chipset\n" error message - it's nice to be able to tell which
branch created the error which is impossible if the error messages are
100% identical.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <j...@chaosbits.net>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv20_graph.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv20_graph.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv20_graph.c
index affc7d7..53cbe84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv20_graph.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv20_graph.c
@@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ nv20_graph_create(struct drm_device *dev)
pgraph->grctx_user = 0x0000;
break;
default:
+ kfree(pgraph);
NV_ERROR(dev, "PGRAPH: unknown chipset\n");
return 0;
}
@@ -773,7 +774,8 @@ nv20_graph_create(struct drm_device *dev)
pgraph->grctx_size = NV35_36_GRCTX_SIZE;
break;
default:
- NV_ERROR(dev, "PGRAPH: unknown chipset\n");
+ kfree(pgraph);
+ NV_ERROR(dev, "PGRAPH: chipset unknown.\n");
return 0;
}
}
--
1.7.6
--
Jesper Juhl <j...@chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
