https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38800
--- Comment #40 from Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> 2011-07-08 03:05:20 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=48883) View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=48883 Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=38800&attachment=48883 Use new frontbuffer fence, if any (In reply to comment #38) > I will probably toy around with this in my spare time if we choose not > to rewrite the entire thing now - which i would sort of prefer, given that the > current implementation is tested to be pretty reliable on r500+ and i have > actual users now starting to use/rely on the radeon timestamping being precise > and reliable. Yeah, sounds like a good plan. However, I think we should at least fix it to use the new frontbuffer fence. Something like the attached patch (only compile tested). (In reply to comment #33) > As Jerome's method is guaranteed to at least accurately report the timestamps > of page flips, [...] I don't understand what would prevent accurate timestamp reporting under any circumstances. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
