From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com>

If the image size would ever read as 0, pci_get_rom_size could keep
processing the same image over and over again.

Reported-by: Federico <federicotg at gmail.com>
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com>
---

v2:
* Use unsigned instead of u16 for the local length variable (not sure if
  the multiplication by 512 could overflow otherwise)
* Integrate length condition into while statement
* Add stable tag

 drivers/pci/rom.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/rom.c b/drivers/pci/rom.c
index f955edb..eb0ad53 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/rom.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/rom.c
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ size_t pci_get_rom_size(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem 
*rom, size_t size)
 {
        void __iomem *image;
        int last_image;
+       unsigned length;

        image = rom;
        do {
@@ -93,9 +94,9 @@ size_t pci_get_rom_size(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem 
*rom, size_t size)
                if (readb(pds + 3) != 'R')
                        break;
                last_image = readb(pds + 21) & 0x80;
-               /* this length is reliable */
-               image += readw(pds + 16) * 512;
-       } while (!last_image);
+               length = readw(pds + 16);
+               image += length * 512;
+       } while (length && !last_image);

        /* never return a size larger than the PCI resource window */
        /* there are known ROMs that get the size wrong */
-- 
2.1.4

Reply via email to