On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 10:12 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Steven Newbury <steve at snewbury.org.uk > > wrote: > > > > I've tried an xserver-1.16, and ddx, libdrm without LTO and with > > gcc4.9. Exactly the same thing. I wondered whether the unused > > i810 > > could be interfering but triggering a device "remove" before > > starting > > X made no difference. > > > > I'm a bit of a loss. I suppose I could try writing a simple test > > for > > drmSetInterfaceVersion(). At least that should determine whether > > the > > xserver/ddx is in the clear. > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > Can you start a non-X runlevel and start X manually as root (assuming > you are using a login manager now)?
I've written a simple test based on the code from radeon_kms.c I just need to try it on the actual hw now... :-) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: test-drm.c Type: text/x-csrc Size: 735 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150707/648c0a9f/attachment.c> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150707/648c0a9f/attachment.sig>