On 03/11/2015 08:47 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:51:02PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: >> >> >> On 03/10/2015 05:47 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:52:41PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: >>>> On 03/10/2015 03:35 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:22:49PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: >>>>>> On 03/10/2015 03:17 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:11:28PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: >>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig >>>>>>>> index 151a050..38f83a0 100644 >>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig >>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig >>>>>>>> @@ -40,6 +40,24 @@ config DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER >>>>>>>> help >>>>>>>> FBDEV helpers for KMS drivers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +config DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION >>>>>>>> + bool "Enable legacy fbdev support for your modesetting driver" >>>>>>>> + depends on DRM >>>>>>>> + select DRM_KMS_HELPER >>>>>>>> + select DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER >>>>>>>> + select FB_SYS_FILLRECT >>>>>>>> + select FB_SYS_COPYAREA >>>>>>>> + select FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT >>>>>>>> + select FB_SYS_FOPS >>>>>>>> + select FB_CFB_FILLRECT >>>>>>>> + select FB_CFB_COPYAREA >>>>>>>> + select FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT >>>>>>>> + default y >>>>>>>> + help >>>>>>>> + Choose this option if you have a need for the legacy fbdev >>>>>>>> + support. Note that this support also provide the linux console >>>>>>>> + support on top of your modesetting driver. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe clarify that for linux console support you also need >>>>>>> CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE? fbdev alone isn't enough. >>>>>> >>>>>> DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER selects that for us, right? >>>>> >>>>> Hm right I've missed that. Reminds me that you need one more patch at the >>>>> end to remove all the various select DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER from all drm >>>>> drivers. Otherwise this knob here won't work by default if you e.g. select >>>>> radeon. In general we can't mix explicit options with menu entries with a >>>>> select. >>>> >>>> I was trying that out. Removing DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER and having >>>> DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION disabled breaks drivers which use FB stuff internally >>>> in >>>> their respective xyz_fbdev.c files. >>> >>> But with the stubbed out functions that should work, right? Why doesn't >>> it? >> >> There are still calls to functions from fb core like fb_set_suspend and >> register_framebuffer which aren't covered by the drm fb helper functions. > > Hm, sounds like we need another patch to stub out fb_set_suspend when > fbdev isn't enabled. Is there anything else?
There are a handful of fb core functions which are called by drm drivers: fb_alloc_cmap/fb_dealloc_cmap fb_sys_read/fb_sys_write register_framebuffer/unregister_framebuffer/unlink_framebuffer/ remove_conflicting_framebuffers fb_set_suspend fb_deferred_io_init/fb_deferred_io_cleanup framebuffer_alloc/framebuffer_release > >>>> Are you saying that we should remove DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER for such drivers and >>>> replace them with 'select DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION'? >>>> >>>> Another option would be to provide #ifdef DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION wrap-arounds >>>> for fb related function calls/declarations in each driver, something that's >>>> already done for i915 and msm drivers. >>> >>> The problem with the patch as-is the massive amounts of selects the FB >>> helper still has. We need to get rid of them so that when you disable >>> fbdev emulation you can indeed disable fbcon and the entire fbdev >>> subsystem. I've thought that remove the hidden symbol DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER >>> and moving all the selects to DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION should work out? If that >>> doesn't work we need to look again how to better stub things out I think. >> >> That's true. Also, as Jani pointed out, maybe it isn't the best idea to make >> every kms driver select DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION? >> >> Maybe the drivers that are currently built with fbdev emulation by default >> can add a 'depends on DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION'? Since the config defaults to y, >> the drivers should run as is. Later, we could take up each driver and build >> the fb stuff only when DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION is set, like how we do for i915 >> and msm? > > Yeah we definitely can't mix select with a user-visible option. I think we > just need to fix up the remaining functions and create stubs for them if > needed and then drop all the selects. Well in DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION we > should still select for fbcon since otherwise tons of bug reports about > "where is my fbcon with kms?". I'll give this a try. Although, it would be a better idea to make the drivers not call these at all when fbdev emulation isn't asked for. With the stubs, if someone does try to use the driver with DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION not set, the worst that'll happen would be that the driver fails to probe. Which isn't so bad. Archit -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project