On 20/05/15 08:11, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Maarten Lankhorst > <maarten at mblankhorst.nl> wrote: >> Op 15-05-15 om 09:11 schreef Alexandre Courbot: >>> Re-pinging Marteen on an email address that still exists :P >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at >>>> nvidia.com> wrote: >>>>> On 03/14/2015 04:33 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>>>>> Hey, >>>>>> >>>>>> Op 13-03-15 om 07:27 schreef Alexandre Courbot: >>>>>>> Add a flag allowing Nouveau to specify that an object should be coherent >>>>>>> at allocation time. This is required for some class of objects like >>>>>>> fences which are randomly-accessed by both the CPU and GPU. This flag >>>>>>> instructs the kernel driver to make sure the object remains coherent >>>>>>> even on architectures for which coherency is not guaranteed by the bus. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> >>>>>> I don't see a problem with this patch, but similar patches to intel to >>>>>> libdrm have been shot down when the changes weren't in an official kernel >>>>>> yet, so I think this should wait until the change is at least in >>>>>> drm-next. >>>>>> ;-) >>>>> Sounds good. I will ping you again once the kernel change reaches -next. >>>> Hi Marteen, >>>> >>>> The kernel change required for this patch is now in -next. Do you >>>> think we can merge it now? >> I think it would be ok to merge now. > Great - who could do this? :P
I could do it. Please provide me with the patch with the necessary R-b and I can push it to our libdrm (and/or mesa).