On 19 November 2015 at 03:35, Chris Zhong <zyw at rock-chips.com> wrote: > The rk3288 MIPI DSI is a Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller > IP. This series adds support for a Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host > controller DRM bridge driver and a rockchip MIPI DSI specific DRM > driver. > > This series also includes a DRM panel driver for BOE TV080WUM-NL0 panel. > This panel only use the MIPI DSI video mode. > > The MIPI DSI feature is tested on rk3288 evb board, backport them to > chrome os kernel v3.14, and it can display normally. > > This patchset is base on the patchset from Ying.liu at freescale.com. > <http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg77181.html> > > > Changes in v3: > move the dw_mipi_dsi.txt to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge > move dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip.txt to bindings/display/rockchip/ > move boe,tv080wum-nl0.txt to bindings/display/panel/ > > Changes in v2: > add the mipi clk id in a single patch > As Thierry.Reding comment, add a documentation for this panel. > > Chris Zhong (10): > clk: rockchip: add id for mipidsi sclk on rk3288 > clk: rockchip: add mipidsi clocks on rk3288 > drm/rockchip: return a true clock rate to adjusted_mode > drm/bridge: Add Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller driver Did you actually rewrite the patch from Liu Ying ? Out of curiosity what was the obstacle of this work getting merged ?
> drm: rockchip: Support Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller > Documentation: dt-bindings: Add bindings for rk3288 DW MIPI DSI driver > ARM: dts: rockchip: add rk3288 mipi_dsi nodes > drm/panel: simple: Add support for BOE TV080WUM-NL0 > drm/panel: simple: Add boe,tv080wum-nl0 simple panel device tree > binding As the DT people will tell you - there is no BOE vendor in bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt. > ARM: dts: rockchip: add support mipi panel tv080wum-nl0 for rk3288-evb > > Liu Ying (2): > drm/dsi: Add a helper to get bits per pixel of MIPI DSI pixel format > Documentation: dt-bindings: Add bindings for Synopsys DW MIPI DSI DRM > bridge driver > >From the above 12 patches only ~6 reached this mailing list is that intentional ? Previously I've seen people CC dri-devel for their panel/bridge DT patches. Regards, Emil