For drm_gem_object_unreference callers are required to hold
dev->struct_mutex, which these paths don't. Enforcing this requirement
has become a bit more strict with

commit ef4c6270bf2867e2f8032e9614d1a8cfc6c71663
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Date:   Thu Oct 15 09:36:25 2015 +0200

    drm/gem: Check locking in drm_gem_object_unreference

Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel at arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.c | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c  | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.c
index cebcab560626..7ea35bee7cd5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.c
@@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ static void armada_drm_crtc_destroy(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
        struct armada_private *priv = crtc->dev->dev_private;

        if (dcrtc->cursor_obj)
-               drm_gem_object_unreference(&dcrtc->cursor_obj->obj);
+               drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&dcrtc->cursor_obj->obj);

        priv->dcrtc[dcrtc->num] = NULL;
        drm_crtc_cleanup(&dcrtc->crtc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c
index 60a688ef81c7..aaf88641bfc5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c
@@ -352,13 +352,13 @@ int armada_gem_mmap_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void 
*data,
                return -ENOENT;

        if (!dobj->obj.filp) {
-               drm_gem_object_unreference(&dobj->obj);
+               drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&dobj->obj);
                return -EINVAL;
        }

        addr = vm_mmap(dobj->obj.filp, 0, args->size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
                       MAP_SHARED, args->offset);
-       drm_gem_object_unreference(&dobj->obj);
+       drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&dobj->obj);
        if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
                return addr;

-- 
2.5.1

Reply via email to