On Wed, Sep 30 2015, kbuild test robot <lkp at intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Rasmus,
>
> [auto build test results on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please 
> ignore]
>
>
> coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c:771:1-13: alloc with no test, 
>>> possible model on line 817
>
> vim +771 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
>
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20  765  
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20  766     srf->sizes = 
> kmalloc(srf->num_sizes * sizeof(*srf->sizes), GFP_KERNEL);
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20  767     if (unlikely(srf->sizes == 
> NULL)) {
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20  768             ret = -ENOMEM;
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20  769             goto out_no_sizes;
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20  770     }
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 @771     srf->offsets = 
> kmalloc(srf->num_sizes * sizeof(*srf->offsets),
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20  772                            
> GFP_KERNEL);
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20  773     if (unlikely(srf->sizes == 
> NULL)) {
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20  774             ret = -ENOMEM;
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20  775             goto out_no_offsets;
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20  776     }
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20  777  

Wauv, that was fast. So, I'm pretty sure this has nothing to do with the
patch I just sent, but there's a bug nevertheless. The NULL test has
been copy-pasted from just above, but we're testing srf->sizes again,
not srf->offsets which we just tried to allocate.

Subject: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: check kmalloc return value

srf->sizes has been allocated and checked a few lines above; fix up
the copy-pasto so that we check srf->offsets.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux at rasmusvillemoes.dk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
index 64b50409fa07..0cf0055e0e08 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ int vmw_surface_define_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void 
*data,
        }
        srf->offsets = kmalloc(srf->num_sizes * sizeof(*srf->offsets),
                               GFP_KERNEL);
-       if (unlikely(srf->sizes == NULL)) {
+       if (unlikely(srf->offsets == NULL)) {
                ret = -ENOMEM;
                goto out_no_offsets;
        }

Reply via email to