With the last patch to ditch DMA_QUEUE support, we should be able
to call the dma cleanup uncoditionally, even when the master has
disappeared.

Do so because it just makes more sense.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
index 6d6dbe5..46f2cfd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
@@ -366,9 +366,6 @@ static void drm_master_release(struct drm_device *dev, 
struct file *filp)
                drm_lock_free(&file_priv->master->lock,
                              
_DRM_LOCKING_CONTEXT(file_priv->master->lock.hw_lock->lock));
        }
-
-       if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_HAVE_DMA))
-               drm_core_reclaim_buffers(dev, file_priv);
 }
 
 static void drm_events_release(struct drm_file *file_priv)
@@ -433,6 +430,9 @@ int drm_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
        if (file_priv->minor->master)
                drm_master_release(dev, filp);
 
+       if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_HAVE_DMA))
+               drm_core_reclaim_buffers(dev, file_priv);
+
        drm_events_release(file_priv);
 
        if (dev->driver->driver_features & DRIVER_GEM)
-- 
1.7.7.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to