On 2016å¹´06æ02æ¥ 14:51, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Mark Yao <mark.yao <at> rock-chips.com> writes:
>> No functional changes, sort the vop registers to make
>> code more readable.
> I might have found a typo. I guess it could be just fixed in this patch,
> if it's already moving the code around. Please see the comments inline.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao <at> rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c | 166 +++++++++++++--------
> ------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.h | 88 +++++++-------
>> 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
>> index 3166b46..e75b2b8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
>> <at> <at> -50,6 +50,87 <at> <at> static const uint32_t
> formats_win_lite[] = {
>> DRM_FORMAT_BGR565,
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct vop_scl_regs rk3066_win_scl = {
> Why is this rk3066 and not rk3036? It doesn't match the sorting order
> introduced by this patch, by the way. Typo?
Right, That is my mistake, It's rk3036_win_scl, Typo problem.
Thanks.
>
>> + .scale_yrgb_x = VOP_REG(RK3036_WIN0_SCL_FACTOR_YRGB, 0xffff, 0x0),
>> + .scale_yrgb_y = VOP_REG(RK3036_WIN0_SCL_FACTOR_YRGB, 0xffff, 16),
>> + .scale_cbcr_x = VOP_REG(RK3036_WIN0_SCL_FACTOR_CBR, 0xffff, 0x0),
>> + .scale_cbcr_y = VOP_REG(RK3036_WIN0_SCL_FACTOR_CBR, 0xffff, 16),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct vop_win_phy rk3036_win0_data = {
>> + .scl = &rk3066_win_scl,
> Ditto.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
ï¼ark Yao
