Hi Peter, Am Montag, den 30.05.2016, 18:39 +0200 schrieb Peter Senna Tschudin: > Devicetree bindings documentation for the GE B850v3 LVDS/DP++ > display bridge. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna at collabora.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3_lvds_dp.txt | 38 > ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3_lvds_dp.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3_lvds_dp.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3_lvds_dp.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..32e123a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3_lvds_dp.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ > +Driver for GE B850v3 LVDS/DP++ display bridge > + > +Required properties: > + - compatible : should be "ge,b850v3_lvds_dp".
In the cover mail you write that this is a combination of the STDP4028 DP transmitter and STDP2690 DP/DP++ converter. So shouldn't this binding comprise two device tree nodes, one with compatible "st,stdp4028", one with "st,stdp2690", then? Is the stdp2690 connected to the stdp4028's i2c master? regards Philipp
