Thanks Eric!
On 2016-05-10 01:06 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: > Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com> writes: > >> On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: >>> robert.foss at collabora.com writes: >>> >>>> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com> >>>> >>>> As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return >>>> -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier >>>> update pending. >>>> >>>> Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is: >>>> >>>> * - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and there is >>>> * an earlier updated pending. Drivers are allowed to support a >>>> queue >>>> * of outstanding updates, but currently no driver supports that. >>>> * Note that drivers must wait for preceding updates to complete >>>> if a >>>> * synchronous update is requested, they are not allowed to fail >>>> the >>>> * commit in that case. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com> >>> >>> This looks good to me. Let's give it a few days on the list for any >>> other KMS folks to catch anything. >>> >> >> I haven't seen any further feedback regarding this patch. >> Does anyone have objections to it being merged? > > I merged it to drm-vc4-next last night, actually :) >
