On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 07:55:20PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:45:43PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > Em Qui, 2016-11-03 às 18:45 +0200, Ville Syrjälä escreveu: > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:37:15PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com > > > > > > > > > --- > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 6 +++--- > > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c > > > > index faa67624e1ed..0028335fc1bb 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c > > > > @@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ void intel_fbc_choose_crtc(struct > > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > > >  > > > >  mutex_lock(&fbc->lock); > > > >  > > > > - for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) { > > > > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) { > > > >  if (fbc->crtc == to_intel_crtc(crtc)) { > > > >  fbc_crtc_present = true; > > > >  break; > > > > @@ -1074,14 +1074,14 @@ void intel_fbc_choose_crtc(struct > > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > > >   * plane. We could go for fancier schemes such as checking > > > > the plane > > > >   * size, but this would just affect the few platforms that > > > > don't tie FBC > > > >   * to pipe or plane A. */ > > > > - for_each_plane_in_state(state, plane, plane_state, i) { > > > > + for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, plane, plane_state, i) > > > > { > > > >  struct intel_plane_state *intel_plane_state = > > > >  to_intel_plane_state(plane_state); > > > >  > > > >  if (!intel_plane_state->base.visible) > > > >  continue; > > > > > > Unrelated but this thing looks somewhat bogus. FBC is tied to the > > > primary plane only, so why do we care about the visibility of the > > > other > > > planes? Adding Paulo to Cc... > > > > Looks like you've found a bug... Thanks! We should really be iterating > > over primary planes only. Adding to the TODO list. > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > - for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, j) > > > > { > > > > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, > > > > crtc_state, j) { > > > > > > Also, can't this inner loop be replaced with a simple > > > crtc = plane_state->crtc ? > > > > Is there a way to get the proposed crtc_state without the loop? > > ...get_existing_crtc_state(plane_state->crtc); > > since the plane is part of the state the crtc should be too, I think.
Well, I guess Maarten wants to change it to get_new_state() soon enough. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC