Hi Christian,
On 25 October 2016 at 17:55, Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote: > Hi Sumit, > > sending this once more with all the patches in once set, cause the last one > turned out to be a bit chaotic because I send from the wrong branch. > > The following patch set fixes the handling in the fence and reservation object > wait function when the timeout is zero. > Thanks for your patches! Adding a few more reviewers. Also, usually, I find it easier if the intro patch comes as (patch 0/X), since that lists all the patches of the patch series as well. If you could do that from next time onwards, that'd be great! > An AMD developer introduced this a while ago to work around some issues in TTM > and our amdgpu driver, but essentially this effort was a bit flawed because > even with a zero timeout enable_signalling() should be called. > > Otherwise someone busy waiting for the fence might never be signaled when you > have hardware with faulty interrupts for example. > > Please review and/or comment, > Christian. > Best regards, Sumit.
