On 10/31/16 19:33, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> On 10/28/16 14:52, Daniel Schultz wrote:
>> This error message will be printed when a FIFO underflow irq has
>> triggered. Since this happens sometimes and the error message will be
>> displayed on the console, it should have a correct spelling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz at phytec.de>
> 
> Picked up for my next pull request.
> 

Oh, and I'll change the subject to match the current prefix convention.

> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c
>> index fe1d088..63caed4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c
>> @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ irqreturn_t tilcdc_crtc_irq(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>      }
>>  
>>      if (stat & LCDC_FIFO_UNDERFLOW)
>> -            dev_err_ratelimited(dev->dev, "%s(0x%08x): FIFO underfow",
>> +            dev_err_ratelimited(dev->dev, "%s(0x%08x): FIFO underflow",
>>                                  __func__, stat);
>>  
>>      /* For revision 2 only */
>>
> 

Reply via email to