[PATCH] drm/imx: Fix of_node ref counting

[Philipp Zabel]

Hi Christophe,

Am Sonntag, den 04.09.2016, 08:45 +0200 schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
> This code is spurious.
> It takes a ref on a node, then call 'of_node_put' on it and then store
> this node somewhere.

The node pointer is not stored. Note that np is not dereferenced at all,
we just compare the pointer value against dev->of_node.
It doesn't matter whether we drop the reference before or after that.

> It is likely that taking the ref on the parent node and releasing the child
> node was expected instead.

Initially, np is assigned to the void *data parameter. The caller holds
the reference to that, and we are not allowed to decrement its refcount
(as of_get_next_parent does). Otherwise the iterator calling this match
function would drop references of all the device_nodes it compares
against.

> So, use 'of_get_next_parent' instead. It does all this in just one
> function call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet at wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> Un-tested
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
> index 438bac8fbc2b..60fb388c80f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
> @@ -449,10 +449,8 @@ static int compare_of(struct device *dev, void *data)
>       }
>  
>       /* Special case for LDB, one device for two channels */
> -     if (of_node_cmp(np->name, "lvds-channel") == 0) {
> -             np = of_get_parent(np);
> -             of_node_put(np);
> -     }

This could have been written as:

        bool match;

        /* Special case for LDB, one device for two channels */
        if (of_node_cmp(np->name, "lvds-channel") == 0) {
                struct device_node *parent = of_get_parent(np);

                match = dev->of_node == parent;
                of_node_put(parent);
        } else {
                match = dev->of_node == np;
        }

        return match;

which does exactly the same. Maybe the reuse of np and the pointer
comparison after of_node_put warrants a comment.

> +     if (of_node_cmp(np->name, "lvds-channel") == 0)
> +             np = of_get_next_parent(np);
>  
>       return dev->of_node == np;
>  }

thanks
Philipp