gcc-4.8 warns about '{0}' being used an an initializer for nested structures:

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c: In function 
‘gfx_v8_0_ring_emit_ce_meta_init’:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c:7263:2: warning: missing braces around 
initializer [-Wmissing-braces]
  } ce_payload = {0};
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c: In function 
‘gfx_v8_0_ring_emit_de_meta_init’:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c:7290:2: warning: missing braces around 
initializer [-Wmissing-braces]
  } de_payload = {0};

Using an empty {} initializer however has the same effect and works on all 
versions.

Fixes: acad2b2a7b70 ("drm/amdgpu:implement CE/DE meta-init routines")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
index 35f9cd83b821..cf1cb406b5ed 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
@@ -7260,7 +7260,7 @@ static void gfx_v8_0_ring_emit_ce_meta_init(struct 
amdgpu_ring *ring, uint64_t c
        static union {
                struct amdgpu_ce_ib_state regular;
                struct amdgpu_ce_ib_state_chained_ib chained;
-       } ce_payload = {0};
+       } ce_payload = {};
 
        if (ring->adev->virt.chained_ib_support) {
                ce_payload_addr = csa_addr + offsetof(struct 
amdgpu_gfx_meta_data_chained_ib, ce_payload);
@@ -7287,7 +7287,7 @@ static void gfx_v8_0_ring_emit_de_meta_init(struct 
amdgpu_ring *ring, uint64_t c
        static union {
                struct amdgpu_de_ib_state regular;
                struct amdgpu_de_ib_state_chained_ib chained;
-       } de_payload = {0};
+       } de_payload = {};
 
        gds_addr = csa_addr + 4096;
        if (ring->adev->virt.chained_ib_support) {
-- 
2.9.0

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to