Am Montag, den 13.02.2017, 10:46 +0100 schrieb Philipp Zabel:
> There is no reason to limit framebuffer size to 64x64 pixels at a
> minimum on creation. The actual scanout limitations (width >= 13 for the
> base plane and height >= 2) are checked in atomic_check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de>

Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.st...@pengutronix.de>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
> index 33404295b447c..bef76cb0d05dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
> @@ -357,8 +357,8 @@ static int imx_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
>        * this value would be used to check framebuffer size limitation
>        * at drm_mode_addfb().
>        */
> -     drm->mode_config.min_width = 64;
> -     drm->mode_config.min_height = 64;
> +     drm->mode_config.min_width = 1;
> +     drm->mode_config.min_height = 1;
>       drm->mode_config.max_width = 4096;
>       drm->mode_config.max_height = 4096;
>       drm->mode_config.funcs = &imx_drm_mode_config_funcs;


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to