Hi Laurent,
On 12-05-2017 10:35, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Tuesday 09 May 2017 18:00:12 Jose Abreu wrote:
>> This changes the connector probe helper function to use the new
>> encoder->mode_valid() and crtc->mode_valid() helper callbacks to
>> validate the modes.
>>
>> The new callbacks are optional so the behaviour remains the same
>> if they are not implemented. If they are, then the code loops
>> through all the connector's encodersXcrtcs and calls the
>> callback.
>>
>> If at least a valid encoderXcrtc combination is found which
>> accepts the mode then the function returns MODE_OK.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joab...@synopsys.com>
>> Cc: Carlos Palminha <palmi...@synopsys.com>
>> Cc: Alexey Brodkin <abrod...@synopsys.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
>> Cc: Dave Airlie <airl...@linux.ie>
>> Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.ha...@samsung.com>
>> Cc: Archit Taneja <arch...@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes v1->v2:
>> - Use new helpers suggested by Ville
>> - Change documentation (Daniel)
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c index 1b0c14a..de47413 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
>> #include <drm/drm_fb_helper.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_edid.h>
>>
>> +#include "drm_crtc_internal.h"
>> +
>> /**
>> * DOC: output probing helper overview
>> *
>> @@ -80,6 +82,54 @@
>> return MODE_OK;
>> }
>>
>> +static enum drm_mode_status
>> +drm_mode_validate_connector(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> + struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> This does more than validating the mode against the connector, it validates
> it
> against the whole pipeline. I would call the function
> drm_mode_validate_pipeline() (or any other similar name).
Yeah, in previous version I had something similar but I changed
in order to address review comments. I can change again though...
>
>> +{
>> + struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
>> + uint32_t *ids = connector->encoder_ids;
>> + enum drm_mode_status ret = MODE_OK;
>> + unsigned int i;
>> +
>> + /* Step 1: Validate against connector */
>> + ret = drm_connector_mode_valid(connector, mode);
>> + if (ret != MODE_OK)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Step 2: Validate against encoders and crtcs */
>> + for (i = 0; i < DRM_CONNECTOR_MAX_ENCODER; i++) {
>> + struct drm_encoder *encoder = drm_encoder_find(dev, ids[i]);
>> + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>> +
>> + if (!encoder)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + ret = drm_encoder_mode_valid(encoder, mode);
>> + if (ret != MODE_OK) {
>> + /* No point in continuing for crtc check as this
> encoder
>> + * will not accept the mode anyway. If all encoders
>> + * reject the mode then, at exit, ret will not be
>> + * MODE_OK. */
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + drm_for_each_crtc(crtc, dev) {
>> + if (!drm_encoder_crtc_ok(encoder, crtc))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + ret = drm_crtc_mode_valid(crtc, mode);
>> + if (ret == MODE_OK) {
>> + /* If we get to this point there is at least
>> + * one combination of encoder+crtc that works
>> + * for this mode. Lets return now. */
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int drm_helper_probe_add_cmdline_mode(struct drm_connector
>> *connector)
>> {
>> struct drm_cmdline_mode *cmdline_mode;
>> @@ -284,7 +334,11 @@ void drm_kms_helper_poll_enable(struct drm_device *dev)
>> * - drm_mode_validate_flag() checks the modes against basic connector
>> * capabilities (interlace_allowed,doublescan_allowed,stereo_allowed)
>> * - the optional &drm_connector_helper_funcs.mode_valid helper can
>> perform
>> - * driver and/or hardware specific checks
>> + * driver and/or sink specific checks
>> + * - the optional &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.mode_valid and
>> + * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.mode_valid helpers can perform driver
>> and/or
>> + * source specific checks which are also enforced by the
>> modeset/atomic
>> + * helpers
>> *
>> * 5. Any mode whose status is not OK is pruned from the connector's modes
>> list,
>> * accompanied by a debug message indicating the reason for the mode's
>> @@ -428,8 +482,8 @@ int
>> drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> if (mode->status == MODE_OK)
>> mode->status = drm_mode_validate_flag(mode,
>> mode_flags);
>>
>> - if (mode->status == MODE_OK && connector_funcs->mode_valid)
>> - mode->status = connector_funcs->mode_valid(connector,
>> + if (mode->status == MODE_OK)
>> + mode->status = drm_mode_validate_connector(connector,
>> mode);
> I would reverse the arguments order to match the style of the other
> validation
> functions.
Hmm, I think it makes more sense to pass connector first and then
mode ...
Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu
>
>> }
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
