On 03/06/17 04:31, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 2 June 2017 at 18:48, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkei...@ti.com> wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Here's second attempt for omapdrm changes for v4.13. The first version 
>> conflicts
>> with the latest drm-next due to the DRM_ROTATE flag changes. This one is 
>> rebased
>> on top of the latest drm-next.
> 
> As much as I dislike rebases (hope you tested), I did try and pull the
> original yesterday, saw conflict nightmare, and held off until I had
> more brain bandwidth to look. Thanks for providing a clean pull in the
> meantime, read my mind!

Yes, the conflict was quite messy. Of course there had to be a
DRM_ROTATE flag rename just at the same time when I did a major rotate
rework for omapdrm =).

I guess you could pull the first version, and solve the conflict by
taking the omapdrm code from the second pull request. But, while I also
dislike rebases like this (yes, I tested and compared the diff to the
first pull request), I'm not sure if that would buy us much.

In any case, I'll do a second round of testing when the pull is in drm-next.

 Tomi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to