Regards

Shashank


On 7/4/2017 9:26 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 07:41:51PM +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote:
YCBCR420 modes are supported only on HDMI 2.0 capable sources.
This patch adds a drm helper to validate YCBCR420-only mode
on a particular connector. This function will help pruning
the YCBCR420-only modes from the connector's modelist.

V5: Introduced the patch in series.

Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sha...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c         |  3 ++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c        | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c |  4 ++++
  include/drm/drm_edid.h             |  1 +
  include/drm/drm_modes.h            |  5 +++++
  5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index b879662..ad26c5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -2947,10 +2947,11 @@ u8 drm_match_cea_mode(const struct drm_display_mode 
*to_match)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_match_cea_mode);
-static bool drm_valid_cea_vic(u8 vic)
+bool drm_valid_cea_vic(u8 vic)
  {
        return vic > 0 && vic < ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes);
  }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_valid_cea_vic);
/**
   * drm_get_cea_aspect_ratio - get the picture aspect ratio corresponding to
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
index f2493b9..3b53c8e3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
@@ -1083,6 +1083,34 @@ drm_mode_validate_size(const struct drm_display_mode 
*mode,
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_validate_size);
+/**
+ * drm_mode_ycbcr420_only - add 'ycbcr420-only' modes only when allowed
+ * @mode: mode to check
+ * @connector: drm connector under action
+ *
+ * This function is a helper which can be used to filter out any YCBCR420
+ * only mode, when the source doesn't support it.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * The mode status
+ */
+enum drm_mode_status
+drm_mode_validate_ycbcr420(const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
+                          struct drm_connector *connector)
+{
+       u8 vic = drm_match_cea_mode(mode);
+       enum drm_mode_status status = MODE_OK;
+       struct drm_hdmi_info *hdmi = &connector->display_info.hdmi;
+
+       if (drm_valid_cea_vic(vic) && test_bit(vic, hdmi->y420_vdb_modes)) {
The drm_valid_cea_vic() check seems redundant to me.
Why do you think we need it?
drm_match_cea_mode() returns 0 in case if a vic is not found. if we take that to test_bit() it will check bit 0 and give wrong results. So first we have to check valid vic, this is also an additional check for YCBCR420 mode
as they must have a valid vic
Also I don't think this will compile since we don't have
y420_vdb_modes[] yet.
Ah, now I recall the reason I wanted to give you, when you asked me to move this patch, before we add ycbcr420 modes. So now this has to go after patch 5 right ? I would re-sequence accordingly.

- Shashank
+               if (!connector->ycbcr_420_allowed)
+                       status = MODE_NO_420;
+       }
+
+       return status;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_validate_ycbcr420);
+
  #define MODE_STATUS(status) [MODE_ ## status + 3] = #status
static const char * const drm_mode_status_names[] = {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
index 00e6832..904966c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
@@ -528,6 +528,10 @@ int drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes(struct 
drm_connector *connector,
                if (mode->status == MODE_OK)
                        mode->status = drm_mode_validate_pipeline(mode,
                                                                  connector);
+
+               if (mode->status == MODE_OK)
+                       mode->status = drm_mode_validate_ycbcr420(mode,
+                                                                 connector);
        }
prune:
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_edid.h b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
index 89c0062..b55b2a7 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_edid.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
@@ -477,4 +477,5 @@ void drm_edid_get_monitor_name(struct edid *edid, char 
*name,
  struct drm_display_mode *drm_mode_find_dmt(struct drm_device *dev,
                                           int hsize, int vsize, int fresh,
                                           bool rb);
+bool drm_valid_cea_vic(u8 vic);
  #endif /* __DRM_EDID_H__ */
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modes.h b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
index 94ac771..f8a1268 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_modes.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct videomode;
   * @MODE_ONE_SIZE: only one resolution is supported
   * @MODE_NO_REDUCED: monitor doesn't accept reduced blanking
   * @MODE_NO_STEREO: stereo modes not supported
+ * @MODE_NO_420: ycbcr 420 modes not supported
   * @MODE_STALE: mode has become stale
   * @MODE_BAD: unspecified reason
   * @MODE_ERROR: error condition
@@ -124,6 +125,7 @@ enum drm_mode_status {
        MODE_ONE_SIZE,
        MODE_NO_REDUCED,
        MODE_NO_STEREO,
+       MODE_NO_420,
        MODE_STALE = -3,
        MODE_BAD = -2,
        MODE_ERROR = -1
@@ -496,6 +498,9 @@ bool drm_mode_equal_no_clocks_no_stereo(const struct 
drm_display_mode *mode1,
  enum drm_mode_status drm_mode_validate_basic(const struct drm_display_mode 
*mode);
  enum drm_mode_status drm_mode_validate_size(const struct drm_display_mode 
*mode,
                                            int maxX, int maxY);
+enum drm_mode_status
+drm_mode_validate_ycbcr420(const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
+                          struct drm_connector *connector);
  void drm_mode_prune_invalid(struct drm_device *dev,
                            struct list_head *mode_list, bool verbose);
  void drm_mode_sort(struct list_head *mode_list);
--
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to