On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 04:49:00PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The last user of these (i915.ko) no longer does. We can slim down the
> core GEM object by removing the unused 8 bytes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Time to celebrate!

Applied, thanks.
-Daniel

> ---
>  include/drm/drm_gem.h | 15 ---------------
>  1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gem.h b/include/drm/drm_gem.h
> index 663d80358057..4a9d231b4294 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_gem.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_gem.h
> @@ -131,21 +131,6 @@ struct drm_gem_object {
>       uint32_t write_domain;
>  
>       /**
> -      * @pending_read_domains:
> -      *
> -      * While validating an exec operation, the
> -      * new read/write domain values are computed here.
> -      * They will be transferred to the above values
> -      * at the point that any cache flushing occurs
> -      */
> -     uint32_t pending_read_domains;
> -
> -     /**
> -      * @pending_write_domain: Write domain similar to @pending_read_domains.
> -      */
> -     uint32_t pending_write_domain;
> -
> -     /**
>        * @dma_buf:
>        *
>        * dma-buf associated with this GEM object.
> -- 
> 2.13.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to