Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-10-25 11:24:19)
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-10-24 17:17:09)
> > Quoting Kees Cook (2017-10-24 16:13:44)
> > > In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer 
> > > to
> > > all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and 
> > > from_timer()
> > > to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> > > Cc: David Airlie <airl...@linux.ie>
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > Cc: intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> > 
> > Thank you for saving me from having to do this myself,
> > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> I've a small batch of selftests patches queued, so added this one and
> will push to drm-intel-next-queued shortly.

Oh dear, major faux pas. There is no timer_setup_on_stack yet.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to