On 06/11/2017 at 10:32, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> Sorry but NACK: the message was malformed and resulted in the >> duplication of the error log that you spotted. >> >> The proper way to fix this is to modify the second occurrence of this >> message. > > * Would you like to achieve that a corresponding message will mention > anything around a property “atmel,dmacon” (instead of “bits-per-pixel”)?
Yes: that would actually fix the wrong log message. > * Can it make sense to adjust the used message format then? In another patch, why not... Beware about the added complexity though. Regards, -- Nicolas Ferre _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
