On 11/23/2017 06:48 AM, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Matthias:
>
> On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 22:41 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>> With the mtk-mmsys MFD device in place, we switch the probing for
>> mt2701 from device-tree to mfd.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrug...@suse.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
>> index dd249cf5121e..5a263aa3ab6e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> #include <drm/drm_of.h>
>> #include <linux/component.h>
>> #include <linux/iommu.h>
>> +#include <linux/mfd/mmsys.h>
>> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>> #include <linux/of_address.h>
>> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> @@ -392,9 +393,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id mtk_ddp_comp_dt_ids[]
>> = {
>>
>> static int mtk_drm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> + struct mmsys_dev *mmsys_private;
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> struct mtk_drm_private *private;
>> - struct device_node *node;
>> + struct device_node *node, *parent_node;
>> struct component_match *match = NULL;
>> int ret;
>> int i;
>> @@ -407,12 +409,23 @@ static int mtk_drm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> INIT_WORK(&private->commit.work, mtk_atomic_work);
>> private->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>>
>> - private->config_regs = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->of_node);
>> - if (IS_ERR(private->config_regs))
>> - return PTR_ERR(private->config_regs);
>> + /* Check if called from mfd */
>> + if (!dev->of_node) {
>> + mmsys_private = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>
> Why do you directly access parent's driver data? You just need the
> device node of mmsys, maybe you could refer to [1].
>
> [1]
> https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/reset/reset-berlin.c#L78
>
The difference is, that the driver you mentioned gets probed via device tree
matching, while we get invoked here through the id_table. So there is no device
node (the if actually checkes for pdev->dev.of_node to identify exactly this
case).
Regards,
Matthias
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
