That is a bug fix, isn't it? If yes maybe add CC:stable and commit it first before all other patches.
Fortunately so far there is no issue directly resulted from that. Thanks Roger(Hongbo.He) -----Original Message----- From: Christian König [mailto:ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:37 PM To: He, Roger <hongbo...@amd.com>; amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] drm/ttm: init locked again to prevent incorrect unlock Am 12.12.2017 um 10:33 schrieb Roger He: > Change-Id: I8db51d843955f5db14bb4bbff892eaedbd9f0abe > Signed-off-by: Roger He <hongbo...@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com> That is a bug fix, isn't it? If yes maybe add CC:stable and commit it first before all other patches. Christian. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index 17fe8be..eb8c568 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > @@ -735,6 +735,7 @@ static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, > place)) { > if (locked) > reservation_object_unlock(bo->resv); > + locked = false; > continue; > } > break; _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
