Hey,
Op 19-12-17 om 06:26 schreef Dhinakaran Pandiyan:
> Convert the power_domains->domain_use_count array that tracks per-domain
> use count to atomic_t type. This is needed to be able to read/write the use
> counts outside of the power domain mutex.
>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 11 +++++------
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 1a7b28f62570..1f1d9162f2c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2764,7 +2764,7 @@ static int i915_power_domain_info(struct seq_file *m,
> void *unused)
> for_each_power_domain(power_domain, power_well->domains)
> seq_printf(m, " %-23s %d\n",
> intel_display_power_domain_str(power_domain),
> - power_domains->domain_use_count[power_domain]);
> +
> atomic_read(&power_domains->domain_use_count[power_domain]));
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 1e4e613e7b41..ddadeb9eaf49 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1489,7 +1489,7 @@ struct i915_power_domains {
> int power_well_count;
>
> struct mutex lock;
> - int domain_use_count[POWER_DOMAIN_NUM];
> + atomic_t domain_use_count[POWER_DOMAIN_NUM];
> struct i915_power_well *power_wells;
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 96ab74f3d101..992caec1fbc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -1453,7 +1453,7 @@ __intel_display_power_get_domain(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> for_each_power_domain_well(dev_priv, power_well, BIT_ULL(domain))
> intel_power_well_get(dev_priv, power_well);
>
> - power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]++;
> + atomic_inc(&power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1539,10 +1539,9 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
>
> mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
>
> - WARN(!power_domains->domain_use_count[domain],
> - "Use count on domain %s is already zero\n",
> + WARN(atomic_dec_return(&power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]) < 0,
> + "Use count on domain %s was already zero\n",
> intel_display_power_domain_str(domain));
> - power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]--;
>
> for_each_power_domain_well_rev(dev_priv, power_well, BIT_ULL(domain))
> intel_power_well_put(dev_priv, power_well);
> @@ -3049,7 +3048,7 @@ static void intel_power_domains_dump_info(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> for_each_power_domain(domain, power_well->domains)
> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(" %-23s %d\n",
> intel_display_power_domain_str(domain),
> -
> power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]);
> +
> atomic_read(&power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]));
> }
> }
>
> @@ -3092,7 +3091,7 @@ void intel_power_domains_verify_state(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> domains_count = 0;
> for_each_power_domain(domain, power_well->domains)
> - domains_count +=
> power_domains->domain_use_count[domain];
> + domains_count +=
> atomic_read(&power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]);
>
> if (power_well->count != domains_count) {
> DRM_ERROR("power well %s refcount/domain refcount
> mismatch "
I can imagine this will start failing really badly. The previous code assumed
that
everything is protected by power_domains->lock, and now this changes makes it no
longer the case..
I see the rest of the code changes things even more, but it would be better if
the
locking rework was done in a single patch, and not bolted on..
And instead of using atomic_t, there is a refcount implementation in refcount.h,
it could be used here for locking power wells only if it would drop to zero..
Cheers,
Maarten
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
