On 2018-01-10 01:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 07:14:41PM +0000, Deposite Pirate wrote: >> December 22, 2017 4:35 PM, "Michel Dänzer" <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: >> >>> "Deposite Pirate", do the attached (only compile tested) patches work? >> >> Hi, >> >> Sorry for the delay. I was not at home for a while. So, I've compiled and >> booted a kernel with both >> of these patches and >> the issue is still present. > > Below a revised version of Michel's first patch. This one should work I > hope. > -Daniel > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c > index d22f4b6a8828..dc0abdf8be00 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c > @@ -213,9 +213,6 @@ void radeon_crtc_load_lut(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; > struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private; > > - if (!crtc->enabled) > - return; > - > if (ASIC_IS_DCE5(rdev)) > dce5_crtc_load_lut(crtc); > else if (ASIC_IS_DCE4(rdev))
Good catch, thanks Daniel. FWIW though, I'd prefer this to be a separate patch, in case it causes any regressions. But let's wait for test results first. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
