Quoting Christian König (2018-01-22 19:32:39) > We need to set shared_count even if we already have a fence to wait for.
You mean for the if (ret > 0 && wait_all && (i + 1 < shared_count) clause. In the case of having the exclusive fence, i=0 (erm, once), but shared_count may still be just 1 and so we still fail to wait for the shared fence in addition to the exclusive fence. -Chris _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
