Quoting Christian König (2018-01-22 19:32:39)
> We need to set shared_count even if we already have a fence to wait for.

You mean for the

if (ret > 0 && wait_all && (i + 1 < shared_count)

clause.

In the case of having the exclusive fence, i=0 (erm, once), but
shared_count may still be just 1 and so we still fail to wait for the
shared fence in addition to the exclusive fence.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to