Hi,

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:26:46PM +0100, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> Some NM PLLs doesn't work well when their output clock rate is set below
> certain rate.
> 
> Add support for that constrain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skra...@siol.net>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.c | 11 +++++++----
>  drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.c
> index a16de092bf94..7fc743c78c1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct _ccu_nm {
>  };
>  
>  static void ccu_nm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
> -                          struct _ccu_nm *nm)
> +                          unsigned long min_rate, struct _ccu_nm *nm)
>  {
>       unsigned long best_rate = 0;
>       unsigned long best_n = 0, best_m = 0;
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void ccu_nm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned 
> long rate,
>               for (_m = nm->min_m; _m <= nm->max_m; _m++) {
>                       unsigned long tmp_rate = parent * _n  / _m;
>  
> -                     if (tmp_rate > rate)
> +                     if (tmp_rate > rate || tmp_rate < min_rate)
>                               continue;
>  
>                       if ((rate - tmp_rate) < (rate - best_rate)) {
> @@ -117,6 +117,9 @@ static long ccu_nm_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned 
> long rate,
>       if (nm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
>               rate *= nm->fixed_post_div;
>  
> +     if (rate < nm->min_rate)
> +             rate = nm->min_rate;
> +

I guess you can just return there. There's no point in trying to find
the factors at this point, since the minimum should be a value that
can be reached.

>       if (ccu_frac_helper_has_rate(&nm->common, &nm->frac, rate)) {
>               if (nm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
>                       rate /= nm->fixed_post_div;
> @@ -134,7 +137,7 @@ static long ccu_nm_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned 
> long rate,
>       _nm.min_m = 1;
>       _nm.max_m = nm->m.max ?: 1 << nm->m.width;
>  
> -     ccu_nm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, &_nm);
> +     ccu_nm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, nm->min_rate, &_nm);

Therefore, you don't need to change the prototype there either.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to