On 13 April 2018 at 11:00, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > This tries to align with the X.org communities's long-standing > tradition of trying to be an inclusive community and handing out > commit rights fairly freely. > > We also tend to not revoke commit rights for people no longer > regularly active in a given project, as long as they're still part of > the larger community. > > Finally make sure that commit rights, like anything happening on fd.o > infrastructre, is subject to the fd.o's Code of Conduct. > > v2: Point at MAINTAINERS for contact info (Daniel S.) > > v3: > - Make it clear that commit rights are voluntary and that committers > need to acknowledge positively when they're nominated by someone > else (Keith). > - Encourage committers to drop their commit rights when they're no > longer active, and make it clear they'll get readded (Keith). > - Add a line that maintainers and committers should actively nominate > new committers (me). > > v4: Typo (Petri). > > v5: Typo (Sean). > > v6: Wording clarifications and spelling (Jani). > > v7: Require an explicit commitment to the documented merge criteria > and rules, instead of just the implied one through the Code of Conduct > threat (Jani). > > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> > Acked-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hi...@intel.com> > Acked-by: Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> > Acked-by: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> > Acked-by: Gustavo Padovan <gust...@padovan.org> > Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latv...@intel.com> > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> > Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hi...@intel.com> > Cc: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> > Cc: Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> > Cc: Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> > Cc: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> > Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gust...@padovan.org> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> > Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> > Cc: Kristian H. Kristensen <hoegsb...@google.com> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latv...@intel.com> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com> > Cc: Sean Paul <seanp...@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com> > --- > If you wonder about the wide distribution list for an igt patch: I'd > like to start a discussions about x.org community norms around commit > rights at large, at least for all the shared repos. I plan to propose > the same text for drm-misc and libdrm too, and hopefully others like > mesa/xserver/wayland would follow. > I think the idea is pretty good, simply highlighting some bits.
What you've outlined in this patch has been in practise for many years: a) undocumented, applicable to most xorg projects [1] b) documented, mesa IMHO having this explicitly documented and others (wayland/weston/wayland-protocols and xserver repos) following suite is a big plus. HTH Emil [1] As in all of https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg but xserver _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
